This is a really good read, long, but worth it, please take the time and read it. I did not write this, and I give credit to the author just below. I just knew I had to post it after I read it.
From Matt Bracken:
In response to recent articles in mainstream military journals discussing the use of the U.S. Army to quell insurrections on American soil,
I offer an alternate vision of the future. Instead of a small town in
the South as the flash point, picture instead a score of U.S. cities in
the thrall of riots greater than those experienced in Los Angeles in
1965 (Watts), multiple cities in 1968 (MLK assassination), and Los Angeles again in 1992 (Rodney King). New Yorkers can imagine the 1977 blackout looting or the 1991 Crown Heights disturbance.
In fact, the proximate spark of the next round of major riots in
America could be any from a long list cribbed from our history.
We have seen them all before, and we shall see them all again
as history rhymes along regardless of the century or the generation of
humankind nominally in control of events. But the next time we are
visited by widespread, large-scale urban riots, a dangerous new
escalation may be triggered by a fresh vulnerability: It’s estimated
that the average American home has less than two weeks of food on hand.
In poor minority areas, it may be much less. What if a cascading economic crisis, even a temporary one, leads to millions of EBT (electronic benefit transfer)
cards flashing nothing but ERROR? This could also be the result of
deliberate sabotage by hackers, or other technical system failures.
Alternatively, the government might pump endless digits into the cards
in a hopeless attempt to outpace future hyperinflation. The government
can order the supermarkets to honor the cards, and it can even set price
controls, but history’s verdict is clear: If suppliers are paid only
with worthless scrip or blinking digits, the food will stop.
STEP ONE: FLASH MOB LOOTING
In my scenario, the initial riots begin spontaneously across affected urban areas, as SNAP (supplemental nutrition assistance program)
and other government welfare recipients learn that their EBT cards no
longer function. This sudden revelation will cause widespread anger,
which will quickly lead to the flash-mob looting of local supermarkets
and other businesses. The media will initially portray these “food
riots” as at least partly justifiable. Sadly, millions of Americans have
been made largely, or even entirely, dependent on government wealth
transfer payments to put food on their tables.
A new social contract has been created, where bread and
circuses buy a measure of peace in our minority-populated urban zones.
In the era of ubiquitous big-screen cable television, the Internet and
smart phones, the circus part of the equation is never in doubt as long
as the electricity flows. But the bread is highly problematic. Food must
be delivered the old-fashioned way: physically. Any disruption in the
normal functioning of the EBT system will lead to food riots with a
speed that is astonishing. This will inevitably happen when our
unsustainable, debt-fueled binge party finally stops, and the music is
over. Now that the delivery of free or heavily subsidized food is
perceived by tens of millions of Americans to be a basic human right,
the cutoff of “their” food money will cause an immediate explosion of
rage. When the hunger begins to bite, supermarkets, shops and
restaurants will be looted, and initially the media will not condemn the
looting. Unfortunately, this initial violence will only be the start of
a dangerous escalation.
The ransacked supermarkets, convenience stores, ATMs and gas
stations will not be restocked during this period due to the precarious
security situation. A single truck loaded with food or gasoline would be
perceived to be a Fort Knox on wheels and subject to immediate attack
unless heavily protected by powerfully armed security forces, but such
forces will not be available during this chaotic period. Under those
conditions, resupply to the urban areas cannot and will not take place.
The downward spiral of social and economic dysfunction will therefore
both accelerate and spread from city to city. These delays, in turn,
will lead to more riots with the constant underlying demand that hungry
people be fed, one way or another.
Catch-22, anyone? When these demands do not bring the desired
outcome, the participants will ratchet up the violence, hoping to force
action by the feckless state and national governments.
The “food riots” will be a grass-roots movement of the moment
born out of hunger and desperation. It will not be dependent upon
leaders or an underlying organization, although they could certainly add
to the sauce. Existing cell phone technology provides all the
organization a flash mob needs. Most of the mobs will consist of
minority urban youths, termed MUYs in the rest of this essay. Which
minority doesn’t matter; each urban locale will come with its own unique
multi-ethnic dynamic.
Some locales will divide upon religious or political lines,
but they will not be the dominant factors contributing to conflict. In
the American context, the divisions will primarily have an ethnic or
racial context, largely because that makes it easy to sort out the sides
at a safe distance. No need to check religious or political affiliation
at a hundred yards when The Other is of a different color.
We Americans are all about doing things the easy way, so,
sadly, visible racial and ethnic features will form the predominant
lines of division.
Would that it were not so, but reality is reality, even when it’s is a bitch.
Especially then.
NEXT STEP: FLASH MOB RIOTS
In order to highlight their grievances and escalate their
demands for an immediate resumption of government benefits, the MUY
flash mobs will next move their activities to the borders of their
ethnic enclaves. They will concentrate on major intersections and
highway interchanges where non-MUY suburban commuters must make daily
passage to and from what forms of employment still exist. People making a
living will still be using those roads to get to where they earn their
daily bread.
The results of these clashes will frequently resemble the
intersection of Florence and Normandie during the Rodney King riots in
1992, where Reginald Denny was pulled out of his truck’s cab and beaten
nearly to death with a cinder block. If you don’t remember it, watch it on Youtube.
Then imagine that scene with the mob-making accelerant of texting and
other social media technology added to stoke the fires. Instead of a few
dozen thugs terrorizing the ambushed intersections, in minutes there
will be hundreds.
Rioters will throw debris such as shopping carts and trash
cans into the intersection, causing the more timid drivers to pause. The
mobs will swarm the lines of trapped cars once they have stopped.
Traffic will be forced into gridlock for blocks in all directions.
Drivers and passengers of the wrong ethnic persuasions will be pulled
from their vehicles to be beaten, robbed, and in some cases raped and/or
killed. It will be hyper-violent and overtly racial mob behavior, on a
massive and undeniable basis.
Some of those trapped in their cars will try to drive out of
the area, inevitably knocking down MUY pedestrians and being trapped by
even more outraged MUYs. The commuters will be dragged out of their cars
and kicked or beaten to death. Other suburban commuters will try to
shoot their way out of the lines of stopped cars, and they will meet the
same grim fate once they run out of bullets and room to escape.
The mob will be armed with everything from knives, clubs and
pistols to AK-47s. A bloodbath will result. These unlucky drivers and
their passengers will suffer horribly, and some of their deaths will be
captured on traffic web cameras. Later, these terrible scenes will be
released or leaked by sympathetic government insiders and shown by the
alternative media, which continue to expand as the traditional media
become increasingly irrelevant.
Implausible, you insist?
This grim tableau is my analysis of age-old human behavior
patterns, adding flash mobs and 2012 levels of racial anger to the old
recipe. Early-teenage MUYs today are frequently playing “The Knockout Game”
on full bellies, just for kicks, and proudly uploading the videos. They
and their older peers can be expected to do far worse when hunger and
the fear of starvation enter their physical, mental, and emotional
equations. The blame for their hunger will be turned outward against the
greater society, and will be vented at first hand against any non-MUY
who falls into their grasp while they are in the thrall of mob hysteria.
These episodes of mass psychology we will refer to as “flash mob
riots”, “wilding”, or some other new name.
THE OFFICIAL POLICE RESPONSE TO FLASH MOB RIOTS
To gear up for even a single “Florence and Normandie on
steroids” flash mob street riot, city police departments will require an
hour or longer to stage their SWAT teams and riot squads in position to
react. Ordinary patrol cars in small numbers will not venture anywhere
near such roiling masses of hysterical rioters, not even to perform
rescues. Those citizens trapped in their cars cannot expect timely
assistance from local or state authorities.
Even in the first days of widespread riots, when the police
forces are well rested, it might take several hours to mount a response
sufficient to quell the disturbance and restore order to even one major
street intersection riot. In the meantime, scores of innocent commuters
will have been attacked, with many of them injured or killed and left at
the scene. It will be a law enforcement nightmare to quell the
disturbance, mop up lingering rioters, restore security, and bring
medical attention to the living and get medical examiners to the dead.
And each jurisdiction will face potentially dozens of such scenes,
thanks to the ability for MUYs to cross-communicate at will using their
wireless devices.
The far more difficult challenge for the police is that by
the time they are suited in riot gear, armed and geared up to sweep the
intersection, it will probably be empty of rioters. The police, with
their major riot squad reaction times measured in hours, will be
fighting flash mobs that materialize, cause mayhem, and evaporate in
only fractions of hours. This rapid cycle time is a clear lesson taken
from massive riots by immigrant French Muslim MUYs in their own religious enclaves and bordering areas.
The American flash mob riot will exist almost entirely inside the law enforcement OODA (observe, orient, decide, act)
loop. In other words, the rioters will have a much quicker reaction
time than the police. Until fairly recently, superior police
communications meant that they could use their radio networks as a force multiplier.
With their networking advantage and cohesive reactions both within a
department and among cooperating local agencies, police could act as
shepherds guiding or dispersing a wayward stampeding flock.
Today, the mob has the greater advantage, immediately
spreading word of every police preparation by text and Tweet, even in
advance of the police movement. Attempts by the authorities to stop the
flash mobs by blocking and jamming wireless transmissions will have
limited success.
It is at this point that the situation spirals out of control.
The enraged mobs in urban America will soon recognize that
their spontaneous street riots cannot be stopped by the police, and then
they will grow truly fearsome. For the police, it will be a losing game
of Whack-a-Mole, with riots breaking out and dispersing at a speed they
cannot hope to match. The violence will spread to previously unaffected
cities as an awareness of law enforcement impotence is spread by
television and social media. After a few days, the police forces will be
exhausted and demoralized. As the violence intensifies and spreads, and
in the absence of any viable security arrangements, supermarkets and
other stores will not be restocked, leaving the MUYs even more desperate
and angry than before. The increasing desperation born of worsening
hunger will refuel the escalating spiral of violence.
Nor will violent conflict be only between the inhabitants of
the urban areas and the suburbs. The international record of conflict in
tri-ethnic cities is grim, making the old bi-racial dichotomy formerly
seen in America seem stable by comparison. In tri-ethnic cities the
perceived balance of power is constantly shifting, with each side in
turn feeling outnumbered and out muscled. Temporary truces, betrayals and
new alliances follow in rapid succession, removing any lingering sense
of social cohesion.
The former Yugoslavia, with its Catholic, Orthodox and Muslim divisions, comes starkly to mind.
The Lebanese Civil War between the Christians, Sunnis, Shiites and
Druze raged across Beirut (at one time known as “The Paris of the Middle
East”) for fifteen brutal years.
Once a city turns on itself and becomes a runaway engine of
self-destruction, it can be difficult to impossible to switch off the
process and return to normal pre-conflict life. It’s not inconceivable
that the United States could produce a dozen Sarajevos or Beiruts,
primarily across racial instead of religious divides.
Vehicle traffic by non-minority suburban commuters through
adjoining minority areas will virtually halt, wrecking what is left of
the local economy. Businesses will not open because employees will not
be able to travel to work safely. Businesses in minority areas, needless
to say, will be looted. “Gentrified” enclaves of affluent suburbanites
within or near the urban zones will suffer repeated attacks, until their
inhabitants flee.
Radically disaffected minorities will hold critical
infrastructure corridors through their areas hostage against the greater
society. Highways, railroad tracks, pipe and power lines will all be
under constant threat, or may be cut in planned or unplanned acts of
raging against “the system.” As long as security in the urban areas
cannot be restored, these corridors will be under threat. Even airports
will not be immune. Many of them have been absorbed into urban areas,
and aircraft will come under sporadic fire while taking off and landing.
In the absence of fresh targets of value blundering into
their areas, and still out of food, MUYs will begin to forage beyond
their desolated home neighborhoods and into suburban borderlands. “Safe”
supermarkets and other stores will be robbed in brazen commando-like
gang attacks. Carjackings and home invasions will proliferate madly. As I
have discussed in my essay “The Civil War Two Cube,”
so-called “transitional” and mixed-ethnic areas will suffer the worst
violence. These neighborhoods will become utterly chaotic killing zones,
with little or no help coming from the overstretched police, who will
be trying to rest up for their next shift on riot squad duty, if they
have not already deserted their posts to take care of their own
families.
THE SUBURBAN ARMED VIGILANTE RESPONSE
In the absence of an effective official police response to
the exploding levels of violence, suburbanites will first hastily form
self-defense forces to guard their neighborhoods—especially ones located
near ethnic borders. These ubiquitous neighborhood armed defense teams
will often have a deep and talented bench from which to select members,
and they will not lack for volunteers.
Since 9-11, hundreds of thousands of young men (and more than
a few women) have acquired graduate-level educations in various aspects
of urban warfare. In the Middle East these troops were frequently
tasked with restoring order to urban areas exploding in internecine
strife. Today these former military men and women understand better than
anyone the life-or-death difference between being armed and organized
versus unarmed and disorganized.
Hundreds of thousands if not millions of veterans currently
own rifles strikingly similar to those they carried in the armed forces,
lacking only the full-automatic selector switch. Their brothers,
sisters, parents, friends, and neighbors who did not serve in the
military are often just as familiar with the weapons, if not the
tactics. Today the AR-pattern rifle (the semi-automatic civilian version
of the familiar full-auto-capable M-16 or M-4) is the most popular
model of rifle in America, with millions sold in the past decade.
Virtually all of them produced in the past decade have abandoned the old
M-16′s signature “carrying handle” rear iron sight for a standardized
sight mounting rail, meaning that virtually every AR sold today can be
easily equipped with an efficient optical sight. Firing the
high-velocity 5.56×45 mm cartridge and mounted with a four-power
tactical sight, a typical AR rifle can shoot two-inch groups at one
hundred yards when fired from a steady bench rest. That translates to
shooting eight- to ten-inch groups at four hundred yards.
Four hundred yards is a long walk. Pace it off on a straight
road, and observe how tiny somebody appears at that distance. Yet a
typical AR rifle, like those currently owned by millions of American
citizens, can hit a man-sized target at that range very easily, given a
stable firing platform and a moderate level of shooting ability.
And there are a far greater number of scoped bolt-action
hunting rifles in private hands in the United States. Keep this number
in mind: based on deer stamps sold, approximately twenty million
Americans venture into the woods every fall armed with such rifles,
fully intending to shoot and kill a two-hundred-pound mammal. Millions
of these scoped bolt-action deer rifles are quite capable of hitting a
man-sized target at ranges out to and even beyond a thousand yards, or
nearly three-fifths of a mile. In that context, the 500-yard effective
range of the average semi-auto AR-pattern rifle is not at all
remarkable.
So, we have millions of men and women with military training,
owning rifles similar to the ones they used in combat operations
overseas from Vietnam to Afghanistan. Many of these Soldiers and Marines
have special operations training. They are former warriors with
experience at conducting irregular warfare and counter-terrorism
operations in dangerous urban environments. They are the opposite of
unthinking robots: their greatest military talent is looking outside the
box for new solutions. They always seek to “over-match” their enemies,
using their own advantages as force multipliers while diminishing or
concealing their weaknesses. These military veterans are also ready,
willing and able to pass on their experience and training to interested
students in their civilian circles.
Let’s return to our hypothetical Florence and Normandie
intersection, but this time with hundreds of rioters per city block,
instead of mere dozens. Among the mobs are thugs armed with pistols and
perhaps even AK-47s equipped with standard iron sights, and except in
rare cases, these rifles have never been “zeroed in” on a target range.
In other words, past a medium distance of fifty to a hundred yards,
these MUY shooters will have little idea where their fired bullets will
strike—nor will they care. Typically, most of the rioters armed with a
pistol, shotgun or an iron-sighted rifle could not hit a mailbox at a
hundred yards unless by luck. Inside that distance, any non-MUY could be
at immediate risk of brutal death at the hands of an enraged mob, but
beyond that range, the mob will pose much less danger.
Taking this imbalance in effective ranges of the firearms
most likely to be available to both sides, certain tactical responses
are sure to arise, and ranking near the top will be the one described
next.
THE SNIPER AMBUSH: THE NEW TACTIC OF CHOICE
The sniper ambush will predictably be used as a counter to
rampaging mobs armed only with short- to medium-range weapons. This
extremely deadly trick was developed by our war fighters in Iraq and
Afghanistan, taking advantage of the significant effective range and
firepower of our scoped 5.56mm rifles. Tactics such as the sniper ambush
may not be seen early in the civil disorder, but they will surely arise
after a steady progression of atrocities attributed to rampaging MUYs.
Street intersection flash mob riots will not be the only type
of violence exploding during periods of civil disorder. As mentioned
earlier, the number and ferocity of home invasions will skyrocket, and
they will be very hard to defend against. Neighborhood self-defense
forces will be able to protect a group of homes if they are located on
cul-de-sacs or in defensible subdivisions with limited entrances,
turning them overnight into fortified gated communities. Individual
homes and apartment buildings located in open grid-pattern neighborhoods
with outside access from many directions will be much more difficult to
defend, and the home invasions will continue.
Carjacking and other forms of armed robbery will proliferate
to previously unimagined levels, leading to a total loss of confidence
in the government’s ability to provide security across all social lines.
Stray bullets striking pedestrians or penetrating houses will take a
frightening toll, even in areas previously considered to be safe. The
police will be exhausted by constant riot-squad duty, and will not even
respond to reports of mere individual acts of violent criminality. They
will simply be overwhelmed, and will be forced to triage their
responses. The wealthy, powerful and politically well-connected will
demand the lion’s share of remaining police resources, further
diminishing the safety of average Americans.
In that context, neighborhood self-defense forces will form
the nucleus of the armed vigilante direct action groups which will
spring up next in the progression. Suburban anger will continue to build
against the MUYs, who are perceived to be the originators of the home
invasions and gang-level armed looting raids. Survivors of street
ambushes, carjackings and home invasions will tell blood-curdling tales
and show horrific scars.
The neighborhood defense teams will evolve into proactive
suburban armed vigilante groups (SAVs) out of a desire to preemptively
take the violence to their perceived enemies, instead of passively
waiting for the next home invasion or carjacking. The SAV teams will
consist of the more aggressive and gung-ho members of the self-defense
forces, who met and compared notes. Often they will be young men with
recent combat experience in the armed forces, who will apply their
military training to the new situation. Major intersections and highway
interchanges where ambush riots have previously occurred will be among
the SAV targets. The SAV reaction times will be measured in minutes,
compared to the hours required by major police department SWAT teams and
riot squads.
A SAMPLE SNIPER AMBUSH SCENARIO
When word is received that a flash mob is forming at one of
their pre-reconnoitered intersections or highway interchanges, the SAV
team will assemble. Sometimes cooperating police will pass tactical
intel to their civilian friends on the outside. Some clever individuals
will have exploited their technical know-how and military experience to
build real-time intel collection tools, such as private UAVs.
Police will have access to urban security camera footage showing MUYs
moving barricade materials into position—a normal prerequisite to a
flash mob riot intended to stop traffic. Tip-offs to the vigilantes will
be common, and where the networks are still functioning, citizens may
still be able to access some video feeds. Sometimes, police will even
join the SAV teams, incognito and off-duty, blurring the teams into
so-called “death squads.”
The operation I will describe (and it’s only one of dozens
that will be tried) uses two ordinary pickup trucks and eight fighters.
Two riflemen are lying prone in the back of each truck, facing rearward,
with removable canvas covers concealing their presence. Their
semi-automatic, scoped rifles are supported at their front ends on
bipods for very accurate shooting. A row of protective sandbags a foot
high is between them and the raised tailgate.
In the cab are a driver and a spotter in the passenger seat
who also serves as the vehicle’s 360-degree security. The two trucks
don’t ever appear on the same stretch of road, but coordinate their
movements using one-word brevity codes over small FRS walkie-talkie radios.
Each truck has a series of predetermined elevated locations where the
intersection in question will lie between 200 and 500 yards away. Each
truck is totally nondescript and forgettable, the only detail perhaps
being the non-MUY ethnicity of the suburbanite driver and spotter
driving relatively near to a riot in progress.
By the time the two SAV pickup trucks arrive at their firing
positions on different streets and oriented ninety degrees to one
another, the flash mob riot is in full swing. A hundred or more of the
rampaging youths are posturing and throwing debris into traffic in order
to intimidate some cars into stopping. The riflemen in the backs of the
pickups are waiting for this moment and know what to expect, trusting
their spotters and drivers to give them a good firing lane. The spotters
in each truck issue a code word on their radios when they are in final
position. The tailgates are swung down, and the leader among the
riflemen initiates the firing. All-around security is provided by the
driver and spotter.
Lying prone and using their bipods for support, the shooters
have five to ten degrees of pan or traverse across the entire
intersection. Individual rioters are clearly visible in the shooters’
magnified optical scopes. Each of the four snipers has a plan to shoot
from the outside of the mob toward the middle, driving participants into
a panicked mass. The left-side shooters start on the left side and work
to the middle, engaging targets with rapid fire, about one aimed shot
per two seconds. Since the two trucks are set at ninety degrees to one
another, very complete coverage will be obtained, even among and between
the stopped vehicles.
The result is a turkey shoot. One magazine of thirty aimed
shots per rifle is expended in under a minute, a coded cease-fire is
called on the walkie-talkies, and the trucks drive away at the speed
limit. The canvas covering the truck beds contains the shooters’ spent
brass. If the trucks are attacked from medium or close range, the canvas
can be thrown back and the two snipers with their semi-automatic rifles
or carbines will add their firepower to that of the driver and spotter.
Back at the intersection, complete panic breaks out among the
rioters as a great number of bullets have landed in human flesh. Over a
score have been killed outright, and many more scream in pain for
medical attention they will not receive in time. The sniper ambush stops
the flash mob cold in its tracks as the uninjured flee in terror,
leaving their erstwhile comrades back on the ground bleeding. The
commuters trapped in their vehicles may have an opportunity to escape.
This type of sniper ambush and a hundred variations on the
theme will finally accomplish what the police could not: put an end to
mobs of violent rioters making the cities through-streets and highways
impassible killing zones. Would-be rioters will soon understand it to be
suicidal to cluster in easily visible groups and engage in mob
violence, as the immediate response could come at any time in the form
of aimed fire from hundreds of yards away. Even one rifleman with a
scoped semi-auto can break up a medium-sized riot.
Many citizens will take to carrying rifles and carbines in
their vehicles, along with their pistols, so that if their cars are
trapped in an ambush they will have a chance to fight their way out. If
their vehicle is stopped outside the immediate area of the flash mob,
they will be able to direct accurate fire at the rioters from a few
hundred yards away. Inside the fatal hundred-yard radius, unlucky
suburbanite drivers and passengers pulled from their cars will still be
brutally violated, but the occurrences of large mob-driven street
ambushes will be much less frequent once long-range retaliation becomes a
frequent expectation.
THE GOVERNMENT RESPONSE TO VIGILANTISM
Where they will be unable to respond swiftly or effectively
to the outbreaks of street riots by MUY flash mobs, the police and
federal agents will respond vigorously to the deadly but smaller
vigilante attacks. These sniper ambushes and other SAV attacks will be
called acts of domestic terrorism and mass murder by government
officials and the mainstream media. A nearly seamless web of urban and
suburban street cameras will reveal some of the SAV teams by their
vehicles, facial recognition programs, and other technical means. Some
early arrests will be made, but the vigilantes will adapt to increasing
law enforcement pressure against them by becoming cleverer about their
camouflage, most often using stolen cars and false uniforms and masks
during their direct-action missions. Observe Mexico today for ideas on
how this type of dirty war is fought.
Eventually, the U.S. Army itself might be called upon to put
out all the social firestorms in our cities, restore order and security,
pacify the angry masses, feed the starving millions, get vital
infrastructure operating again, and do it all at once in a dozen
American Beiruts, Sarajevos and Mogadishus.
Good luck to them, I say.
A few hundred “Active IRA” tied down thousands of British
troops in one corner of a small island for decades. The same ratios have
served the Taliban well over the past decade while fighting against the
combined might of NATO. Set aside for a moment the angry starving
millions trapped in the urban areas, and the dire security issues
arising thereof. Just to consider the official reaction to vigilantism
separately, it’s unlikely that any conceivable combinations of local and
state police, federal law enforcement, National Guard or active-duty
Army actions could neutralize or eliminate tens of thousands of former
special operations troops intent on providing their own form of
security. Millions of Americans are already far better armed and trained
than a few hundred IRA or Taliban ever were. And the police and Army
would not be operating from secure fire bases, their families living in
total safety thousands of miles away in a secure rear area. In this
scenario, there is no rear area, and every family member, anywhere,
would be at perpetual risk of reprisal actions by any of the warring
sides.
In this hyper-dangerous environment, new laws forbidding the
carrying of firearms in vehicles would be ignored as the illegitimate
diktat of dictatorship, just when the Second Amendment is needed more
than ever. Police or military conducting searches for firearms at
checkpoints would themselves become targets of vigilante snipers.
Serving on anti-firearms duty would be seen as nothing but pure treason
by millions of Americans who took the oath to defend the Constitution,
including the Bill of Rights. Politicians who did not act in the
security interest of their local constituents as a result of political
correctness or other reasons would also be targeted.
A festering race war with police and the military in the
middle taking fire from both sides could last for many years, turning
many American cities into a living hell. Remember history: when the
British Army landed in Northern Ireland in 1969, they were greeted with flowers and applause from the Catholics.
The Tommys were welcomed as peacekeepers who would protect them from
Protestant violence. That soon changed. Likewise with our tragic misadventure in Lebanon back in 1982 and 1983.
Well-intended referees often find themselves taking fire from all
sides. It’s as predictable as tomorrow’s sunrise. Why would it be any
different when the U.S. Army is sent to Los Angeles, Chicago or
Philadelphia to break apart warring ethnic factions?
For a long time after these events, it will be impossible for
the warring ethnic groups to live together or even to mingle
peacefully. Too much rage and hatred will have been built up on all
sides of our many American multi-ethnic fault lines. The new wounds will
be raw and painful for many years to come, as they were in the South
for long after the Civil War. The fracturing of the urban areas, divided
by no-man’s-lands, will also hinder economic redevelopment for many
years because the critical infrastructure corridors will remain
insecure.
Eventually, high concrete “Peace Walls” like those in
Belfast, Northern Ireland, will be installed where the different ethnic
groups live in close proximity. That is, if recovery to sane and
civilized norms of behavior are ever regained in our lifetimes and we
don’t slide into a new Dark Age, a stern and permanent tyranny,
warlordism, anarchy, or any other dire outcome.
Dark Ages can last for centuries, after sinking civilizations
in a vicious, downward vortex. “When the music’s over, turn out the
lights,” to quote Jim Morrison of The Doors. Sometimes the lights stay
out for a long time. Sometimes civilization itself is lost. Millions of
EBT cards flashing zeroes might be the signal event of a terrible
transformation.
It is a frightening thing to crystallize the possible
outbreak of mass starvation and racial warfare into words, so that the
mind is forced to confront agonizingly painful scenarios. It is much
easier to avert one’s eyes and mind from the ugliness with politically
correct Kumbaya bromides. In this grim essay, I am describing a brutal
situation of ethnic civil war not differing much from the worst scenes
from recent history in Rwanda, South Africa, Mexico, Bosnia, Iraq, and
many other places that have experienced varying types and degrees of
societal collapse. We all deplore the conditions that might drive us
toward such a hellish outcome, and we should work unceasingly to return
America to the path of true brotherhood, peace and prosperity. Race
hustlers of every stripe should be condemned.
Most of us wish we could turn back the calendar to Norman
Rockwell’s America. But we cannot, for that America is water long over
the dam and gone from our sight, if not from our memories. John Adams
said, “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people.
It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” If that is
true, judging by current and even accelerating cultural shifts, we might
already have passed the point of no return.
The prudent American will trim his sails accordingly.
Tactical information, training, and gear recommendations to prepare individuals, families, groups, and militias to be ready for the coming collapse. We need to be prepared, be trained, and be willing to fight for our once great nation when needed. Prepare now fellow patriots for some day soon we will be called to stand up to tyranny!
Showing posts with label National Defence Authorization Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label National Defence Authorization Act. Show all posts
Monday, October 1, 2012
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
Founders
Hello patriots, I want to get the word out about a great book, by a great patriot. I would like to do what I can to help this book get on the best sellers list. If that happens more Americans will be exposed to this book, and may have their eyes opened to what is going on in this country.
Order your copy today. It’s BOOK BOMB DAY!
The more orders, the further the price is driven down, and the higher the ratings are driven up!
Founders: A Novel of the Coming Collapse
by James Wesley Rawles
THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT IS GONE.
It’s the near future, and thanks to a perfect storm of reckless banking practices, hyperinflation, a stock market gone mad, and the negligence of our elected officials, the entire social, political, and economic infrastructure of America has collapsed. Chaos reigns in the streets, medical treatment is no longer available, and a silent coup has placed a dangerous group of men at the helm of a false government. America’s fate is in the hands of those few individuals who have the survival skills, the faith, and the forethought to return this country to the state its founding fathers intended.
Please share this, so we can get the word out.
http://astore.amazon.com/thetactpatr-20/detail/143917282X
Order your copy today. It’s BOOK BOMB DAY!
The more orders, the further the price is driven down, and the higher the ratings are driven up!
Founders: A Novel of the Coming Collapse
by James Wesley Rawles
THE WORLD AS WE KNOW IT IS GONE.
It’s the near future, and thanks to a perfect storm of reckless banking practices, hyperinflation, a stock market gone mad, and the negligence of our elected officials, the entire social, political, and economic infrastructure of America has collapsed. Chaos reigns in the streets, medical treatment is no longer available, and a silent coup has placed a dangerous group of men at the helm of a false government. America’s fate is in the hands of those few individuals who have the survival skills, the faith, and the forethought to return this country to the state its founding fathers intended.
Please share this, so we can get the word out.
http://astore.amazon.com/thetactpatr-20/detail/143917282X
Friday, September 7, 2012
This is a must see, and a must share video!
Please watch this and share it, get the word out. It is time people woke up and did something.
Labels:
Bill of Rights,
Constitution,
DHS,
False Flag,
Federal Reserve,
FEMA,
Freedom,
Gun Confiscation,
Gun rights,
Liberty or Death,
Martial Law,
Militia,
National Defence Authorization Act,
New World Order,
wake up
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
False flag event???
Here is another article from Mr. Hagmann, if his source is legit, we have some serious things to worry about.
DHS Source: “It’s going hot”
By Douglas J. Hagmann28 August 2012:
“It’s going hot.” Those were the ominous opening and closing words from my source inside the Department of Homeland Security in two separate contacts we had within the last 72 hours. Readers to this website and listeners to my radio program know this source as “Rosebud,” a source with access to high levels within the DHS administration.
I would feel the same, and did so as well until the last few years. Today, things are much different than they were four years ago, or even last year at this time. Judi McLeod, award-winning founder and editor of Canada Free Press and not one to succumb to delusion or fantasy, points this out and provides a solid foundation for this possibility in her column published on August 27, 2012 titled “Staged crisis leading to suspended elections could happen on our watch.” What a difference four years can make.
New information from DHS source
According to my well-placed source within the DHS apparatus, what amounts to a final authorization was reportedly given to DHS directly from the White House. A “go signal” if you will.
“It’s going hot. The plan, or whatever specific operation that was devised, is going hot, being put into motion. You’ve got to let people know that something is up, approval has been given, and unless somebody stops it, we’re going to have a staged event inside the U.S., and it’s being set up so that it gets real ugly real fast.” Obviously, I asked for clarification and more details.
“Look, I’ll tell you everything I know, what I’ve heard and seen, and some of what I’ve been told, but you’ve got to get this public. Even then, I’m not sure we know enough about the specific operational details, have enough time, or have the ability to overcome the characterizations of lunacy they’re going to throw at you, at us, for even talking about this. I’ve heard you talk about the ‘normalcy bias’ of most Americans, and that’s part of what we’re fighting. Look at what they did to you and the content of last information I gave to you. It was like that pass a secret game in first grade, you know, where one student whispers something in the ear of the kid next to him and it’s passed around the room until it gets to the last student. By that time, it’s nothing like the original ‘secret.’ It’s the lesson kids learn about spreading gossip. There was some state representative from Tennessee that sent out a mass e-mail of a screwed up version of what you wrote and then later retracted it,” he stated.
I reminded him that it was Tennessee State Representative Kelly Keisling who sent an e-mail to his constituents based on what amounted to third-hand information he read on the Internet. It centered around an alleged fake assassination attempt, something I never wrote, I told him. “Yes, that’s it. Didn’t you find the timing of that odd? I mean, the information I gave you was back in late April. When did Keisling send that e-mail and then make his very public retraction? Two or three weeks ago? Give me a break. They wanted to discredit you and anyone who makes public their intentions as bad as they want to know where the leaks are coming from,” he stated. “Believe me when I tell you they are desperate on a number of levels.”
My source continued: “Don’t think for one second that the sudden resurrection of the information, as incorrect as it was by that state rep, was an accident, because it wasn’t,” he replied. “Maybe the rep was played and clueless to the original story, but the way the story was managed after the fact made you look like a fool, like a real nutcase,” he said. I thanked him for the reminder.
“That’s their playbook,” he emphasized. “[Glenn] Beck, you on CFP, your show and others who talk about Alinksy tactics are right. Remember, Alinsky when he wrote that ridicule is the most potent weapon, and there is no defense because it irrational and infuriating. Trust me when I tell you that you are going to get hit hard and called crazy, this time with much greater intensity. Expect it the closer we get to the end game. But, pay attention to who is exploiting the false rumors, and you’ll get an idea who is behind the larger agenda,” he added.
I asked my source for details. “What exactly is the plan? Can you give me specific details? How do you know about this plan ‘going hot?’”
“Okay, from what I’ve been able to learn, there have been a couple different plans or scenarios developed, ready to be implemented at a moment’s notice, but each are distinctly different in nature and timing.” stated my source. “This is done for a few reasons. Look how the weather changed the plans for [Vice-President Joe] Biden’s visit to Tampa. That’s just one example. They’ve got contingencies. They are watching the poll numbers.
They are closely monitoring public sentiment. But the objective of the plan is that they want to portray Obama as a victim of racist hatred by the white gun owners, the people concerned about the Constitution, the people they consider fringe. They want to silence their critics, prove that talk show hosts are causing hatred, and that all gun owners are behind the recent shootings. That’s at the heart of the plan. But to understand just how insidious this is, you’ve got to understand the people who are behind it.”
Nero in the White House, Caligula at the DHS
My source continued, “I’ve been trying to get as much information as possible, but it’s not been easy. This is definitely a plan that has its origins at the highest levels of the White House, and seems limited to maybe a handful of the people closest to Obama. The only reason I know about this authorization order, or approval, or whatever you want to call it, is that there was a major slip up at the very upper level of DHS, and I mean the very upper level” he stated.
“Remember the news about sexual harassment, intimidation and all of the garbage that’s gone on between the people Napolitano brought in and promoted due to their ‘lifestyle’ preferences? These are some sick people, mental rapists and perverts, who she’s brought in to her innermost circle. They make Caligula look like a boy scout, at least with power and sex. Well, one of those people, close to Napolitano, was involved in a meeting where the concept and approval of a false flag was being discussed.”
“This is where they almost lost it. You’ve got to understand that this whole thing is very compartmentalized and we’re talking about a very small group of people in this meeting. This person knew some of the information, not all of it, and let some information slip to a counterpart. That counterpart, who found herself involved in a situation way over her head, talked. I won’t go any further, but that’s how I ended up learning the latest information,” said my source. “Now you should have an idea of how this slipped out. But they had a quick handle on damage control, given the circumstances behind the disclosure. Potentially embarrassing circumstances, sexual blackmail” he added.
I asked my source whether DHS is involved in the actual planning or staging of the event. In response, this source stated that Janet Napolitano and her closest aides are playing a supporting role. ” She has to be involved because she has to control the response to a staged event. She’s involved to coordinate and implement the clampdown, after the fact. She does what she’s told. From everything I’ve heard, I believe the plans come from Valerie Jarrett and possibly a close friend and Obama associate who has a very big stake in Obama’s re-election.”
“What happens and when it happens depends on the events of the next sixty days. If it appears that Obama does not have a lock on the next four years to finish what he started, what he has been told to do, then watch for it ‘going hot.’”
http://theintelhub.com/2012/08/29/dhs-inside-source-claims-obama-white-house-set-to-stage-major-false-flag-its-going-hot/
Labels:
DHS,
False Flag,
FEMA,
Gun Confiscation,
Gun rights,
Liberty or Death,
Martial Law,
Militia,
National Defence Authorization Act,
New World Order,
Patriot,
prepper,
Revolution,
TEOTWAWKI,
UN,
United Nations
Tuesday, August 28, 2012
What is going on in this country?
DHS and US Military Make Final Preparations Before Announcing Martial Law
By Susanne Posel, Contributing Writertheintelhub.com
August 8, 2012
Informants and military personnel are coming forth anonymously to confirm that martial law “is right around the corner.”
However, right now we are under a silent martial law and citizens are reporting strange and unexplainable activity from the US armed forces and multiple federal agencies that point to a covert preparatory operation to completely lock down America in the very near future.
Sources from multiple locations across the nation have independently confirmed that the US military are repositioning soldiers in conjunction with allied foreign troops in the initial stages of martial law.
The US military are secretly moving massive amounts of “equipment” across the country consistently for more than a year. In Phoenix, Arizona, tractor-trailers transporting tanks on public highways have been spotted.
One witness stated that he saw these flatbeds multiple times in the month of June. Eye witness reports are coming primarily from the northern and southern Border States.
Peter Santilli, an ex-marine informant who was a specialist in aviation deployed weapons, explains that a refrigerated truck, allocated by the administration department on base, was directed to the commissary, where the unsuspecting driver believed that he was transporting food.
The weapon was placed at the head of the trailer, and covered up with either food stores (like cans of soup) or body bags. In the event that the truck is stopped en route, the weapon would be well hidden and go undetected by inspectors on the public highways.
Santilli, who was assigned to ride in the cab of the truck with the driver, says that his orders were to make sure the truck arrived at its destination.
If there were problems concerning potential civil unrest, he was to radio into his superiors for aid by either air or ground support. Should the situation warrant serious attention; crowd control methods would be implemented.
One possible scenario was the use of cluster bomb units (CBUs) that will emit upon detonation, a “sleep and kill” chemical weapon that will not disturb infrastructure, but is lethal to all living things within the effected zone.
Santilli describes these particular 3 unit CBUs as shaped like water-heaters with a coned top and plunger-like device. Once deployed in the air, a parachute assists these CBUs to the targeted area. And when detonated, a deadly chemical gas will kill every human and animal in the specified cordoned area.
The acquisition of armory by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and contracts for bullet-proof glass for check-point booths to be positioned strategically throughout the nation on public highways have heightened awareness that the US government is preparing for a well-planned domestic military action. DHS armored vehicles have been sighted on highways in Kentucky.
When citizens attempt to capture the activity on film, some have their cameras confiscated; sometimes after a physical altercation.
On Google Maps, where known military bases were once visible, some strategic areas are now blurred out.
John (a pseudonym) was contracted by DHS to “fill in caves, mines and block trails”. Now these measures are being stepped up, as independent contractors are being brought to mountainous regions and told to block all entrances into the mountains, by way of caves and other areas where people could possibly “hide out in the hills” during a riot situation under declaration of martial law.
Forested areas in states like Montana, Missouri and Arkansas are being closed to the public while military activity is being witnessed by locals. Those commercially contracted civilians working in these areas are allocated parallel shifts and compartmentalized projects to provide for an intelligence controlled operation.
One informant relayed an incident where he was detained on a forest road by unidentified “paramilitary” officials that seized his rifle from the rack on the back of his vehicle.
Another source said that while traveling in a national forest park, he and his party were met by what appeared to be a military police officer who demanded that they turn back.
Residents in Pine Mountain, Georgia and Spruce Mountain, Nevada have had confrontations with US armed forces.
When travelling in public national forested areas, military police with “automatic weapons” say that locals cannot gather wood in surrounding forested spaces (as they have traditionally done for decades). One man in particular had his rifle forcibly confiscated by unidentified armed men.
On dirt roads leading to the Lassen National Forest reserve, paving is being laid over the gravel roads. The locals know that secret underground drilling or tunneling is being conducted. Whenever they enter the park, they are quickly escorted out by heavily armed and quite menacing persons. Even once abandoned logging roads are beginning to see activity again.
Information coming out of reserve units in Arizona is that they are being put on official alert. Military personnel are being told by superiors not to schedule vacations and prepare to be on-call and on-duty indefinitely.
According to one informant, these new assignments are not providing for deployment overseas, but rather for domestic service with the intimation that these deployments may have relation to civil unrest expectations.
In Lake Havasu, Arizona, and Colorado Springs as well as Fort Collins, Colorado, locals are coming forth to report that local fires may have been lit by foreign troops; specifically Russian forces that have been spotted in the area. These Russian troops are believed to be stationed at Fort Carson, Colorado.
Military drills, a.k.a. urban warfare, have been played out in many states by the Pentagon and other branches of the US armed forces.
In Plainville and Worchester, Massachusetts, surprised citizens witnessed last “Wednesday evening. . . military helicopters descended on the vacant Wood School [in] the late hours of the night in a scene that might have appeared to simulate the United States’ special forces attack on Osama bin Laden’s compound last year.” Many locals had their homes swooped down upon by black helicopters in an obvious display of military dominance over the general public.
Residents saw helicopters landing near Worcester Memorial Auditorium in Lincoln Square. Local newspapers were flooded with “telephone calls and e-mails . . . curious about what was happening.”
The local police claim they were unaware of the drills.
A US Army spokeswoman made a half-hearted apology for “any inconvenience or unforeseen disturbance.”
In Hollywood, Florida, DHS and the Hollywood Police Department have taken part in Master Rappelling training exercises (MPTE) with Blackhawk helicopters scheduled over various government-owned buildings. Details concerning the drills are being kept from the public for “security reasons”.
MPTE are special operations to teach law enforcement and military techniques in tactical rope and rappelling skills that can be used in helicopter deployment and advanced tactical training.
Just this month, foreign troops were caught at a Wal-Mart . They were travelling in what were described as “large government vans”.
Law-enforcement battalions have been created out of Camp Pendleton, California, consisting of specialized military police (SMPs) that would be deployed to assist in any event of civil disturbance, handling of detainees, use biometrics to identify suspects and conduct forensic work.
Their assistance is not limited to conducting DUIs and writing speeding tickets in an effort to re-brand the Marine Corps as being more involved with average work now allocated to local law enforcement.
Moving around in white, unmarked vans, strange troops have been seen purchasing food and water at another Wal-Mart in Franklin, Indiana. Parading in military personnel fatigues where drone activity has been reported in Oklahoma City and black helicopters were spotted hovering over a construction site.
According to documents from the RAND Corporation, a planned event concerning a Police Stabilization Force within the US will be “a mix of military and police forces to deal with a range of threats.”
The study explains:
• What the response should be
• The creation of a high-end police force
• Costs for this military/police collaborative force
Estimates are $637.3 million annually and including many federal agencies including: the US Marshals Service, the US Secret Service, the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs (INL) in the Department of State, and the US Army’s Military Police.
There is a media blackout concerning the “state of emergency” (code for martial law) that Anaheim, California residents have been under since the murder of a man by local police.
While protests have been conducted, residents say that “outsiders” are infiltrating peaceful demonstrations to stir up violence and ensure local and military police action against them.
While city officials are gearing up for “another large incident” and “another riot” protesters are coming forth to voice their distain at the “infiltrators” that attended a protest that ended with the fatal shooting of two Latino men.
During protest marches in Anaheim, the white, unmarked vans have resurfaced. This time unidentified “police” detained protesters and placed them into these vans.
The increased activity across the nation in conjunction with the mounting citizen reports of seeing military on their streets, conducting urban warfare drills, and spotting foreign troops have prompted public interest in the US government’s plans to enact a full-scale martial law in America – expected by the end of this year.
The more attention that is brought to these sightings and the more people come forward with information, the safer the American public will be.
The US military have orders to shoot and kill all dissenters. They are being trained to confiscate guns and detain people in “internment” or FEMA camps. For the sake of continuity of government, they are being told to turn on their own fellow Americans.
Labels:
American,
Bill of Rights,
DHS,
FEMA,
food storage,
Freedom,
Gun Confiscation,
Gun rights,
Liberty or Death,
Martial Law,
Military,
Militia,
National Defence Authorization Act,
New World Order,
US Military
Friday, August 24, 2012
Veteran Declared ‘Mentally Defective,’ Has Guns Seized
Now this is crazy. So now the government can take away veterans guns who have PTSD, because they might be dangerous... Seriously, PTSD is caused by what our great American heroes were exposed to while fighting for our great nation, and so we treat them like this??? This is NOT acceptable!!!
News of similar case emerges day after release of Brandon Raub
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Friday, August 24, 2012
News of similar case emerges day after release of Brandon Raub
Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Friday, August 24, 2012
Just a day after Brandon Raub was released following his
incarceration in a psychiatric ward over political Facebook posts, news
has emerged of a similar case involving a veteran who had his guns
seized after being labeled a “mental defective’ and faces being
committed by a judge.
Radio host Steve Quayle was sent news of
an Army combat veteran and Purple Heart recipient in west central Ohio
who was the victim of a police raid on the evening of August 22nd during
which Miami County Ohio Sheriff’s deputies executed a search warrant to
seize the man’s firearms for the “safety of the defendant and the general public,” according to the warrant.
The veteran, who is currently unnamed, had his guns
taken because he was adjudged to be mentally incompetent, despite the
fact that his previous VA psychiatric evaluations were all clear, he is
not on medication, and he had no criminal record .
The man appears to be a respected member of the community – he works
for a Christian company and his father is a police officer and a pastor.
“The person is under adjudication of mental
incompetence, has been adjudicated as a mental defective, has been
committed to a mental institution, has been found by a court to be a
mentally ill person subject to hospitalization by court order, or is an
involuntary patient other than one who is a patient only for purposes of
observation. As used in this division, “mentally ill person subject to
hospitalization by court order” and “patient” have the same meanings as
in section 5122.01 of the Revised Code,” states the warrant.
Amongst the items confiscated were a .45 caliber pistol,
one .380 caliber pistol, a 12 gauge shotgun, two AR-15 rifles, a
stripped AR-15 lower receiver, as well as a hunting knife.
“In addition to the confiscations, the deputies attempted to question my friend and his fiancee,” states the email
sent to Quayle by the man’s friend. “I didn’t get specific details on
the questions asked. They refused to answer any questions without an
attorney present. When my friend stated, “This is bullshit,” one of the
deputy detectives remarked, “Look man, I’m just doing my job.”
The veteran now faces “an evaluation of mental
competency” with a judge who will decide whether he should be committed
to a state psychiatric ward. If any more weapons are found on the man’s
property in the interim he will have committed a felony and will face a
jail sentence.
Since the veteran is active in the so-called truth
movement or patriot community, it is assumed that his involvement in
this field is part of the reason why he has been targeted for
psychiatric evaluation.
“Unlike Brandon Raub’s case, however, the state of Ohio
won’t allow law enforcement to involuntarily commit a person unless
there is an immediate need to do so, such as holding a gun to their head
or another person’s head,” states the email. “Ohio law requires a judge
to make the decision on having a person evaluated for mental illness.
Of course, you’re then evaluated by a state-appointed psych, and that
isn’t exactly going to play out in your favor. Had my friend lived in
Virginia, he may be sitting in a metal hospital (prison) right now. Or
worse.”
The veteran’s lawyer has already filed motions
attempting to discover who asked the judge to sign the search warrant
and for what reason he was declared mentally defective.
Earlier this year, we reported on a similar case involving David Sarti, one of the participants in the National Geographic Channel’s Doomsday Prepper show.
Sarti visited his doctor complaining of chest pains, only to have the
doctor later commit him to a psychiatric ward and alert authorities,
before Sarti was declared “mentally defective” and put on an FBI list
that stripped him of his second amendment rights.
Brandon Raub, a former veteran of the wars in
Afghanistan and Iraq, was also involuntarily detained for psychiatric
questioning last week by authorities in Virginia’s Chesterfield County
for leaving anti-establishment messages on Facebook which questioned the
official story behind 9/11 and referred to corruption within the U.S.
government. Raub also posted song lyrics on a private message board.
The FBI claimed Raub’s posts were “terrorist in nature” and yet within a week Raub was ordered to be released by a judge who found that the original petition for his detention contained no facts whatsoever on the reason for his incarceration.
Raub’s lawyer John Whitehead revealed that shortly before his release, psychiatrists had threatened to forcibly medicate Raub in order to “brainwash” him.
Whitehead warned that there were 20,000 recent cases in
Virginia alone of people being snatched from their homes having been
declared mentally defective by the state with virtually no due process
whatsoever and with the victim having committed no crime.
Critics have made comparisons to the infamous psikhushka
psychiatric prisons in the former Soviet Union where dissidents were
sent to be isolated, brainwashed, and have their political ideas
discredited amongst the general public.
Given the fact that the Department of Homeland Security has repeatedly demonized veterans as likely domestic terrorists,
it’s clear that former servicemen are being targeted as part of an
effort to chill free speech and discourage other veterans from being
politically active.
*********************
Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com.
He is the author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular
fill-in host for The Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.
Labels:
Constitution,
detention,
FEMA,
Freedom,
Gun Confiscation,
Gun rights,
infowars,
Martial Law,
National Defence Authorization Act,
New World Order,
NRA,
prepare,
prison planet tv,
PTSD,
wake up
Thursday, August 23, 2012
Warrantless cellphone tracking is legal, federal court rules
This article is from NBC news, I can't even believe they covered this story.
An interstate drug trafficker hauling a motor home filled with marijuana isn’t the most sympathetic defendant. But a federal court’s declaration that Melvin Skinner pretty much should’ve known his pre-paid cellphone could be tracked via GPS — and therefore cops didn’t require a warrant to track him — has repercussions that privacy advocates say deserve your attention.
Even if you don’t drive around in recreational vehicles loaded down more than a thousand pounds of pot.
On Tuesday, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that law enforcement officials don’t need a warrant to track suspects via cellphones. Attorneys argued to overturn Skinner’s many convictions, citing that theGPS location
information that led to the defendant’s arrest was obtained in
violation of the Fourth Amendment, which guards against unreasonable
searches and seizures. This didn’t wash with the majority of judges over
the case, who voted in a 2-1 ruling.
“When criminals use modern technological devices to carry out criminal acts and to reduce the possibility of detection, they can hardly complain when the police take advantage of the inherent characteristics of those very devices to catch them,” wrote Judge John Rogers in the majority opinion that will affect future cases in a huge chunk of the country.
Skinner was arrested in 2006, with 1,100 pounds of marijuana in the motor home he was driving, after law enforcement officials tracked him via one of the pre-paid phones the drug ring purchased using false identities. Such “burner” phones are regularly discarded by criminals to avoid tracking. In this case however, officials obtained Skinner’s number from another member of the ring, and then a court order that required the cellphone company to disclose “cell site information, GPS real-time location, and ‘ping’ data” for Skinner’s phone.
Accessing this information, law enforced trailed Skinner to a Texas rest area where a drug-sniffing dog turned up 1,100 pounds of pot in the motor home he was driving. Skinner was arrested, of course, and was convicted of conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute over 1,000 kilograms of marijuana, conspiracy to commit money laundering, aiding and abetting the attempt to distribute in excess of 100 kilograms of marijuana — charges his lawyers say were derived by a warrantless search in violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Here's the crux, as it may relate to everyone else: "There is no Fourth Amendment violation because Skinner did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the data given off by his voluntarily procured pay-as-you-go cellphone." That's what Judge Rogers stated in the in the majority opinion, where he cited the Stored Communications Act. The law hamstrings the Fourth Amendment in relation to wire and electronic communications — noting that the use of third-party providers diminishes a person's expectation of privacy.
Rogers maintains his statement within the context of committing a crime. As the judge writes, "If a tool used to transport contraband gives off a signal that can be tracked for location, certainly the police can track the signal." Failing that, "technology would help criminals but not the police."
This ruling is creating cognitive dissonance among privacy advocates who note that in January, all nine members of the Supreme Court held that warrantless GPS tracking is unconstitutional. In that case, police tracked suspected drug dealer Antoine Jones for 28 days — without a warrant — via a GPS device they’d attached to his car.
"That the officers were able to use less expensive and more efficient means to track the vehicles is only to theircredit ," he wrote.
Given the ubiquity ofcellphones
— most of which come with some form of GPS automatically enabled — this
latest ruling rings a warning bell among privacy advocates.
"Location data is extraordinarily sensitive. It can reveal where you worship, where your family and friends live, what sort of doctors you visit, and what meetings and activities you attend," Electronic Frontier Foundation senior staff attorney Marcia Hofmann wrote in a blog post prior to the court's decision.
"Whether this information is collected by a GPS device or a mobile phone company, the government should only be able to get it with a warrant based on probable cause that's approved by a judge."
"The 6th Circuit’s cell-tracking opinion is really disappointing. It’s the first appeals court decision about cell tracking after the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Jones and I’d hoped for a better result," Catherine Crump, staff attorney for the ACLU Speech, Privacy and Technology Project, told NBC News.
Crump led the ACLU’s blockbuster analysis of collection of cellphone location data by local police. The results, released earlier this year, revealed that many of the 200 law enforcement agencies that responded to the ACLU’s public records request, track cellphones without a warrant.
In this latest, ruling, Crump said, “the court seems to think that if criminals use cellphones, they can hardly complain if they are tracked through these phones. But the court’s reasoning deprives all of us of constitutional protection against warrantless cellphone tracking. And besides, even suspected bad guys have constitutional rights.”
-- Bob Sullivan of Red Tape Chronicles contributed to this report.
An interstate drug trafficker hauling a motor home filled with marijuana isn’t the most sympathetic defendant. But a federal court’s declaration that Melvin Skinner pretty much should’ve known his pre-paid cellphone could be tracked via GPS — and therefore cops didn’t require a warrant to track him — has repercussions that privacy advocates say deserve your attention.
Even if you don’t drive around in recreational vehicles loaded down more than a thousand pounds of pot.
On Tuesday, the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that law enforcement officials don’t need a warrant to track suspects via cellphones. Attorneys argued to overturn Skinner’s many convictions, citing that the
“When criminals use modern technological devices to carry out criminal acts and to reduce the possibility of detection, they can hardly complain when the police take advantage of the inherent characteristics of those very devices to catch them,” wrote Judge John Rogers in the majority opinion that will affect future cases in a huge chunk of the country.
Skinner was arrested in 2006, with 1,100 pounds of marijuana in the motor home he was driving, after law enforcement officials tracked him via one of the pre-paid phones the drug ring purchased using false identities. Such “burner” phones are regularly discarded by criminals to avoid tracking. In this case however, officials obtained Skinner’s number from another member of the ring, and then a court order that required the cellphone company to disclose “cell site information, GPS real-time location, and ‘ping’ data” for Skinner’s phone.
Accessing this information, law enforced trailed Skinner to a Texas rest area where a drug-sniffing dog turned up 1,100 pounds of pot in the motor home he was driving. Skinner was arrested, of course, and was convicted of conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute over 1,000 kilograms of marijuana, conspiracy to commit money laundering, aiding and abetting the attempt to distribute in excess of 100 kilograms of marijuana — charges his lawyers say were derived by a warrantless search in violation of the Fourth Amendment.
Here's the crux, as it may relate to everyone else: "There is no Fourth Amendment violation because Skinner did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the data given off by his voluntarily procured pay-as-you-go cellphone." That's what Judge Rogers stated in the in the majority opinion, where he cited the Stored Communications Act. The law hamstrings the Fourth Amendment in relation to wire and electronic communications — noting that the use of third-party providers diminishes a person's expectation of privacy.
Rogers maintains his statement within the context of committing a crime. As the judge writes, "If a tool used to transport contraband gives off a signal that can be tracked for location, certainly the police can track the signal." Failing that, "technology would help criminals but not the police."
This ruling is creating cognitive dissonance among privacy advocates who note that in January, all nine members of the Supreme Court held that warrantless GPS tracking is unconstitutional. In that case, police tracked suspected drug dealer Antoine Jones for 28 days — without a warrant — via a GPS device they’d attached to his car.
"That the officers were able to use less expensive and more efficient means to track the vehicles is only to their
Given the ubiquity of
"Location data is extraordinarily sensitive. It can reveal where you worship, where your family and friends live, what sort of doctors you visit, and what meetings and activities you attend," Electronic Frontier Foundation senior staff attorney Marcia Hofmann wrote in a blog post prior to the court's decision.
"Whether this information is collected by a GPS device or a mobile phone company, the government should only be able to get it with a warrant based on probable cause that's approved by a judge."
"The 6th Circuit’s cell-tracking opinion is really disappointing. It’s the first appeals court decision about cell tracking after the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Jones and I’d hoped for a better result," Catherine Crump, staff attorney for the ACLU Speech, Privacy and Technology Project, told NBC News.
Crump led the ACLU’s blockbuster analysis of collection of cellphone location data by local police. The results, released earlier this year, revealed that many of the 200 law enforcement agencies that responded to the ACLU’s public records request, track cellphones without a warrant.
In this latest, ruling, Crump said, “the court seems to think that if criminals use cellphones, they can hardly complain if they are tracked through these phones. But the court’s reasoning deprives all of us of constitutional protection against warrantless cellphone tracking. And besides, even suspected bad guys have constitutional rights.”
-- Bob Sullivan of Red Tape Chronicles contributed to this report.
Sunday, August 19, 2012
The Grey State
This is a description of the movie from the makers;
The world reels with the turmoil of war, geological disaster, and economic collapse, while Americans continue to submerge themselves in illusions of safety and immunity. While rights are sold for security, the federal government, swollen with power, begins a systematic takeover of liberty in order to bring about a New World Order.
Americans, quarantined to militarized districts, become a population ripe for tyrannical control.
Fear mongering, terrorism, police state, martial law, war, arrest, internment, hunger, oppression, violence, resistance – these are the new terms by which Americans define their existence. Neighbor is turned against neighbor as the value of the dollar plunges to zero, food supplies are depleted, and everyone is a terror suspect. There are arrests. Disappearances. Bio attacks. Public executions of those even suspected of dissent. Even rumors of concentration camps on American soil.
This is the backdrop to an unfolding story of resistance. American militias prepare for guerilla warfare. There are mass defections from the military as true Patriots attempt to rally around the Constitution and defend liberty, preparing a national insurgency against federal forces, knowing full well this will be the last time in history the oppressed will be capable of organized resistance.
It is a time of transition, of shifting alliance, of mass awakening and mass execution. It is an impending storm, an iron-gray morning that puts into effect decades of over-comfort and complacency, and Americans wake up to an occupied homeland. It is a time of lists – black list,white list , and those still caught in the middle, those who risk physical death for theirfree will and those who sell their souls to maintain their idle thoughts and easy comforts. It is in this Gray State that the perpetuation of human freedom will be contested, or crushed.
Is it the near future, or is it the present? The Gray State is coming – by consent or conquest. This is battlefield USA.
Ideas for Government
Enact term limits for Congress so they cannot sit there forever and only concentrate on their personal political future. If Congress had a definite time limit in office then maybe, just maybe they would do what is right for the country instead of just what will get them further down their own political road.
Make an amendment to the Constitution for our leaders to balance our countries budget. We need to really start taking fiscal responsibility for ourselves and our country.
Our leaders need to start paying off our debt!!! When you have debt you answer to other entities, thus you no longer have complete control over your situation. That means someone has a form of control over you, you are answerable to them. Do we really want our country to have to answer to China or any of the other countries that control our debt? I do not think so.
Take away a lot of the power the Federal Government has and return it to where it belongs, which is the States. Our Federal Government is supposed to according to the Constitution go to the States and ask permission to do things, not the other way around. Government has gotten WAY to large at the Federal level. Government as a whole is involved in MANY things that they have no business in. Our wonderful (NOT) Government has succeeded in making us reliant on it. We should be reliant on ourselves, not our Government. Like the famous line from JFK's speech, "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country"! Now that line says a lot, think about it.
We need to get rid of the entitlement mentality that is very prevalent in our country. Many people feel the government owes them something. The government owes us a safe and secure place to live and fair laws that will enable us to prosper. They should not be trying to control us by making us reliant on them!
We need to stand up as Americans, work hard, get involved in our government, take back the control and ensure our great nation has just as great a future as our past and our beginnings.
This country was founded on the principals of limited governmental power, not the seemingly unlimited ways in which our government now pushes itself on us.
Is our government supposed to provide food, education, welfare and health care for us, or are they supposed to provide a safe environment for us to take care of ourselves? Today a lot of people are all too happy to sit back and let the government run their lives. Is this what the government is supposed to be doing? No it is not!
We need to stop having an entitlement mentality and start taking care of and responsibility for ourselves. People today seem to think that the government owes them something, yes the government does owe us something, they owe us proper representation and a safe environment for us to work hard and to be successful ourselves.
Our government does not owe us many of the things they provide today. In fact our nation would be much better off if we got rid of many programs, downsized our government and took a look at our values.
We need to stand up to defend our Constitution and the rights it gives us, we need to stop letting our freedoms slip through our fingers, we need to make a change NOW!
Sunday, May 20, 2012
Police State?
Police State 4
Please watch and think about it.
We need to ensure things like this do NOT happen in this country!
Sunday, March 18, 2012
Martial Law? Obama Issues Executive Order: ‘National Defense Resources Preparedness’
PART VIII – GENERAL PROVISIONS
Sec. 801. Definitions. In addition to the definitions in section 702 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2152, the following definitions apply throughout this order:
(a) “Civil transportation” includes movement of persons and property by all modes of transportation in interstate, intrastate, or foreign commerce within the United States, its territories and possessions, and the District of Columbia, and related public storage and warehousing, ports, services, equipment and facilities, such as transportation carrier shop and repair facilities. “Civil transportation” also shall include direction, control, and coordination of civil transportation capacity regardless of ownership. “Civil transportation” shall not include transportation owned or controlled by the Department of Defense, use of petroleum and gas pipelines, and coal slurry pipelines used only to supply energy production facilities directly.
(b) “Energy” means all forms of energy including petroleum, gas (both natural and manufactured), electricity, solid fuels (including all forms of coal, coke, coal chemicals, coal liquification, and coal gasification), solar, wind, other types of renewable energy, atomic energy, and the production, conservation, use, control, and distribution (including pipelines) of all of these forms of energy.
(c) “Farm equipment” means equipment, machinery, and repair parts manufactured for use on farms in connection with the production or preparation for market use of food resources.
(d) “Fertilizer” means any product or combination of products that contain one or more of the elements nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium for use as a plant nutrient.
(e) “Food resources” means all commodities and products, (simple, mixed, or compound), or complements to such commodities or products, that are capable of being ingested by either human beings or animals, irrespective of other uses to which such commodities or products may be put, at all stages of processing from the raw commodity to the products thereof in vendible form for human or animal consumption. “Food resources” also means potable water packaged in commercially marketable containers, all starches, sugars, vegetable and animal or marine fats and oils, seed, cotton, hemp, and flax fiber, but does not mean any such material after it loses its identity as an agricultural commodity or agricultural product.
(f) “Food resource facilities” means plants, machinery, vehicles (including on farm), and other facilities required for the production, processing, distribution, and storage (including cold storage) of food resources, and for the domestic distribution of farm equipment and fertilizer (excluding transportation thereof).
(g) “Functions” include powers, duties, authority, responsibilities, and discretion.
(h) “Head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense” means the heads of the Departments of State, Justice, the Interior, and Homeland Security, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the General Services Administration, and all other agencies with authority delegated under section 201 of this order.
(i) “Health resources” means drugs, biological products, medical devices, materials, facilities, health supplies, services and equipment required to diagnose, mitigate or prevent the impairment of, improve, treat, cure, or restore the physical or mental health conditions of the population.
(j) “National defense” means programs for military and energy production or construction, military or critical infrastructure assistance to any foreign nation, homeland security, stockpiling, space, and any directly related activity. Such term includes emergency preparedness activities conducted pursuant to title VI of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5195 et seq., and critical infrastructure protection and restoration.
(k) “Offsets” means compensation practices required as a condition of purchase in either government to government or commercial sales of defense articles and/or defense services as defined by the Arms Export Control Act, 22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq., and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, 22 C.F.R. 120.1 130.17.
(l) “Special priorities assistance” means action by resource departments to assist with expediting deliveries, placing rated orders, locating suppliers, resolving production or delivery conflicts between various rated orders, addressing problems that arise in the fulfillment of a rated order or other action authorized by a delegated agency, and determining the validity of rated orders.
(m) “Strategic and critical materials” means materials (including energy) that (1) would be needed to supply the military, industrial, and essential civilian needs of the United States during a national emergency, and (2) are not found or produced in the United States in sufficient quantities to meet such need and are vulnerable to the termination or reduction of the availability of the material.
(n) “Water resources” means all usable water, from all sources, within the jurisdiction of the United States, that can be managed, controlled, and allocated to meet emergency requirements, except “water resources” does not include usable water that qualifies as “food resources.”
Sec. 802. General. (a) Except as otherwise provided in section 802(c) of this order, the authorities vested in the President by title VII of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2151 et seq., are delegated to the head of each agency in carrying out the delegated authorities under the Act and this order, by the Secretary of Labor in carrying out part VI of this order, and by the Secretary of the Treasury in exercising the functions assigned in Executive Order 11858, as amended.
(b) The authorities that may be exercised and performed pursuant to section 802(a) of this order shall include:
(1) the power to redelegate authorities, and to authorize the successive redelegation of authorities to agencies, officers, and employees of the Government; and
(2) the power of subpoena under section 705 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2155, with respect to (i) authorities delegated in parts II, III, and section 702 of this order, and (ii) the functions assigned to the Secretary of the Treasury in Executive Order 11858, as amended, provided that the subpoena power referenced in subsections (i) and (ii) shall be utilized only after the scope and purpose of the investigation, inspection, or inquiry to which the subpoena relates have been defined either by the appropriate officer identified in section 802(a) of this order or by such other person or persons as the officer shall designate.
(c) Excluded from the authorities delegated by section 802(a) of this order are authorities delegated by parts IV and V of this order, authorities in section 721 and 722 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2170 2171, and the authority with respect to fixing compensation under section 703 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2153.
Sec. 803. Authority. (a) Executive Order 12919 of June 3, 1994, and sections 401(3) (4) of Executive Order 12656 of November 18, 1988, are revoked. All other previously issued orders, regulations, rulings, certificates, directives, and other actions relating to any function affected by this order shall remain in effect except as they are inconsistent with this order or are subsequently amended or revoked under proper authority. Nothing in this order shall affect the validity or force of anything done under previous delegations or other assignment of authority under the Act.
(b) Nothing in this order shall affect the authorities assigned under Executive Order 11858 of May 7, 1975, as amended, except as provided in section 802 of this order.
(c) Nothing in this order shall affect the authorities assigned under Executive Order 12472 of April 3, 1984, as amended.
Sec. 804. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect functions of the Director of OMB relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
BARACK OBAMA
THE WHITE HOUSE,
March 16, 2012.
Sec. 801. Definitions. In addition to the definitions in section 702 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2152, the following definitions apply throughout this order:
(a) “Civil transportation” includes movement of persons and property by all modes of transportation in interstate, intrastate, or foreign commerce within the United States, its territories and possessions, and the District of Columbia, and related public storage and warehousing, ports, services, equipment and facilities, such as transportation carrier shop and repair facilities. “Civil transportation” also shall include direction, control, and coordination of civil transportation capacity regardless of ownership. “Civil transportation” shall not include transportation owned or controlled by the Department of Defense, use of petroleum and gas pipelines, and coal slurry pipelines used only to supply energy production facilities directly.
(b) “Energy” means all forms of energy including petroleum, gas (both natural and manufactured), electricity, solid fuels (including all forms of coal, coke, coal chemicals, coal liquification, and coal gasification), solar, wind, other types of renewable energy, atomic energy, and the production, conservation, use, control, and distribution (including pipelines) of all of these forms of energy.
(c) “Farm equipment” means equipment, machinery, and repair parts manufactured for use on farms in connection with the production or preparation for market use of food resources.
(d) “Fertilizer” means any product or combination of products that contain one or more of the elements nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium for use as a plant nutrient.
(e) “Food resources” means all commodities and products, (simple, mixed, or compound), or complements to such commodities or products, that are capable of being ingested by either human beings or animals, irrespective of other uses to which such commodities or products may be put, at all stages of processing from the raw commodity to the products thereof in vendible form for human or animal consumption. “Food resources” also means potable water packaged in commercially marketable containers, all starches, sugars, vegetable and animal or marine fats and oils, seed, cotton, hemp, and flax fiber, but does not mean any such material after it loses its identity as an agricultural commodity or agricultural product.
(f) “Food resource facilities” means plants, machinery, vehicles (including on farm), and other facilities required for the production, processing, distribution, and storage (including cold storage) of food resources, and for the domestic distribution of farm equipment and fertilizer (excluding transportation thereof).
(g) “Functions” include powers, duties, authority, responsibilities, and discretion.
(h) “Head of each agency engaged in procurement for the national defense” means the heads of the Departments of State, Justice, the Interior, and Homeland Security, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, the Central Intelligence Agency, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the General Services Administration, and all other agencies with authority delegated under section 201 of this order.
(i) “Health resources” means drugs, biological products, medical devices, materials, facilities, health supplies, services and equipment required to diagnose, mitigate or prevent the impairment of, improve, treat, cure, or restore the physical or mental health conditions of the population.
(j) “National defense” means programs for military and energy production or construction, military or critical infrastructure assistance to any foreign nation, homeland security, stockpiling, space, and any directly related activity. Such term includes emergency preparedness activities conducted pursuant to title VI of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5195 et seq., and critical infrastructure protection and restoration.
(k) “Offsets” means compensation practices required as a condition of purchase in either government to government or commercial sales of defense articles and/or defense services as defined by the Arms Export Control Act, 22 U.S.C. 2751 et seq., and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, 22 C.F.R. 120.1 130.17.
(l) “Special priorities assistance” means action by resource departments to assist with expediting deliveries, placing rated orders, locating suppliers, resolving production or delivery conflicts between various rated orders, addressing problems that arise in the fulfillment of a rated order or other action authorized by a delegated agency, and determining the validity of rated orders.
(m) “Strategic and critical materials” means materials (including energy) that (1) would be needed to supply the military, industrial, and essential civilian needs of the United States during a national emergency, and (2) are not found or produced in the United States in sufficient quantities to meet such need and are vulnerable to the termination or reduction of the availability of the material.
(n) “Water resources” means all usable water, from all sources, within the jurisdiction of the United States, that can be managed, controlled, and allocated to meet emergency requirements, except “water resources” does not include usable water that qualifies as “food resources.”
Sec. 802. General. (a) Except as otherwise provided in section 802(c) of this order, the authorities vested in the President by title VII of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2151 et seq., are delegated to the head of each agency in carrying out the delegated authorities under the Act and this order, by the Secretary of Labor in carrying out part VI of this order, and by the Secretary of the Treasury in exercising the functions assigned in Executive Order 11858, as amended.
(b) The authorities that may be exercised and performed pursuant to section 802(a) of this order shall include:
(1) the power to redelegate authorities, and to authorize the successive redelegation of authorities to agencies, officers, and employees of the Government; and
(2) the power of subpoena under section 705 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2155, with respect to (i) authorities delegated in parts II, III, and section 702 of this order, and (ii) the functions assigned to the Secretary of the Treasury in Executive Order 11858, as amended, provided that the subpoena power referenced in subsections (i) and (ii) shall be utilized only after the scope and purpose of the investigation, inspection, or inquiry to which the subpoena relates have been defined either by the appropriate officer identified in section 802(a) of this order or by such other person or persons as the officer shall designate.
(c) Excluded from the authorities delegated by section 802(a) of this order are authorities delegated by parts IV and V of this order, authorities in section 721 and 722 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2170 2171, and the authority with respect to fixing compensation under section 703 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2153.
Sec. 803. Authority. (a) Executive Order 12919 of June 3, 1994, and sections 401(3) (4) of Executive Order 12656 of November 18, 1988, are revoked. All other previously issued orders, regulations, rulings, certificates, directives, and other actions relating to any function affected by this order shall remain in effect except as they are inconsistent with this order or are subsequently amended or revoked under proper authority. Nothing in this order shall affect the validity or force of anything done under previous delegations or other assignment of authority under the Act.
(b) Nothing in this order shall affect the authorities assigned under Executive Order 11858 of May 7, 1975, as amended, except as provided in section 802 of this order.
(c) Nothing in this order shall affect the authorities assigned under Executive Order 12472 of April 3, 1984, as amended.
Sec. 804. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect functions of the Director of OMB relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
BARACK OBAMA
THE WHITE HOUSE,
March 16, 2012.
Martial Law? Obama Issues Executive Order: ‘National Defense Resources Preparedness’ 4-7
PART IV – VOLUNTARY AGREEMENTS AND ADVISORY COMMITTEES
Sec. 401. Delegations. The authority of the President under sections 708(c) and (d) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2158(c), (d), is delegated to the heads of agencies otherwise delegated authority under this order. The status of the use of such delegations shall be furnished to the Secretary of Homeland Security.
Sec. 402. Advisory Committees. The authority of the President under section 708(d) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2158(d), and delegated in section 401 of this order (relating to establishment of advisory committees) shall be exercised only after consultation with, and in accordance with, guidelines and procedures established by the Administrator of General Services.
Sec. 403. Regulations. The Secretary of Homeland Security, after approval of the Attorney General, and after consultation by the Attorney General with the Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission, shall promulgate rules pursuant to section 708(e) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2158(e), incorporating standards and procedures by which voluntary agreements and plans of action may be developed and carried out. Such rules may be adopted by other agencies to fulfill the rulemaking requirement of section 708(e) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2158(e).
PART V – EMPLOYMENT OF PERSONNEL
Sec. 501. National Defense Executive Reserve. (a) In accordance with section 710(e) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2160(e), there is established in the executive branch a National Defense Executive Reserve (NDER) composed of persons of recognized expertise from various segments of the private sector and from Government (except full time Federal employees) for training for employment in executive positions in the Federal Government in the event of a national defense emergency.
(b) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall issue necessary guidance for the NDER program, including appropriate guidance for establishment, recruitment, training, monitoring, and activation of NDER units and shall be responsible for the overall coordination of the NDER program. The authority of the President under section 710(e) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2160(e), to determine periods of national defense emergency is delegated to the Secretary of Homeland Security.
(c) The head of any agency may implement section 501(a) of this order with respect to NDER operations in such agency.
(d) The head of each agency with an NDER unit may exercise the authority under section 703 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2153, to employ civilian personnel when activating all or a part of its NDER unit. The exercise of this authority shall be subject to the provisions of sections 501(e) and (f) of this order and shall not be redelegated.
(e) The head of an agency may activate an NDER unit, in whole or in part, upon the written determination of the Secretary of Homeland Security that an emergency affecting the national defense exists and that the activation of the unit is necessary to carry out the emergency program functions of the agency.
(f) Prior to activating the NDER unit, the head of the agency shall notify, in writing, the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism of the impending activation.
Sec. 502. Consultants. The head of each agency otherwise delegated functions under this order is delegated the authority of the President under sections 710(b) and (c) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2160(b), (c), to employ persons of outstanding experience and ability without compensation and to employ experts, consultants, or organizations. The authority delegated by this section may not be redelegated.
PART VI – LABOR REQUIREMENTS
Sec. 601. Secretary of Labor. (a) The Secretary of Labor, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of other agencies, as deemed appropriate by the Secretary of Labor, shall:
(1) collect and maintain data necessary to make a continuing appraisal of the Nation’s workforce needs for purposes of national defense;
(2) upon request by the Director of Selective Service, and in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, assist the Director of Selective Service in development of policies regulating the induction and deferment of persons for duty in the armed services;
(3) upon request from the head of an agency with authority under this order, consult with that agency with respect to: (i) the effect of contemplated actions on labor demand and utilization; (ii) the relation of labor demand to materials and facilities requirements; and (iii) such other matters as will assist in making the exercise of priority and allocations functions consistent with effective utilization and distribution of labor;
(4) upon request from the head of an agency with authority under this order: (i) formulate plans, programs, and policies for meeting the labor requirements of actions to be taken for national defense purposes; and (ii) estimate training needs to help address national defense requirements and promote necessary and appropriate training programs; and
(5) develop and implement an effective labor management relations policy to support the activities and programs under this order, with the cooperation of other agencies as deemed appropriate by the Secretary of Labor, including the National Labor Relations Board, the Federal Labor Relations Authority, the National Mediation Board, and the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.
(b) All agencies shall cooperate with the Secretary of Labor, upon request, for the purposes of this section, to the extent permitted by law.
PART VII – DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT COMMITTEE
Sec. 701. The Defense Production Act Committee. (a) The Defense Production Act Committee (Committee) shall be composed of the following members, in accordance with section 722(b) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2171(b):
(1) The Secretary of State;
(2) The Secretary of the Treasury;
(3) The Secretary of Defense;
(4) The Attorney General;
(5) The Secretary of the Interior;
(6) The Secretary of Agriculture;
(7) The Secretary of Commerce;
(8) The Secretary of Labor;
(9) The Secretary of Health and Human Services;
(10) The Secretary of Transportation;
(11) The Secretary of Energy;
(12) The Secretary of Homeland Security;
(13) The Director of National Intelligence;
(14) The Director of the Central Intelligence Agency;
(15) The Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers;
(16) The Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; and
(17) The Administrator of General Services.
(b) The Director of OMB and the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall be invited to participate in all Committee meetings and activities in an advisory role. The Chairperson, as designated by the President pursuant to section 722 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2171, may invite the heads of other agencies or offices to participate in Committee meetings and activities in an advisory role, as appropriate.
Sec. 702. Offsets. The Secretary of Commerce shall prepare and submit to the Congress the annual report required by section 723 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2172, in consultation with the Secretaries of State, the Treasury, Defense, and Labor, the United States Trade Representative, the Director of National Intelligence, and the heads of other agencies as appropriate. The heads of agencies shall provide the Secretary of Commerce with such information as may be necessary for the effective performance of this function.
Sec. 401. Delegations. The authority of the President under sections 708(c) and (d) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2158(c), (d), is delegated to the heads of agencies otherwise delegated authority under this order. The status of the use of such delegations shall be furnished to the Secretary of Homeland Security.
Sec. 402. Advisory Committees. The authority of the President under section 708(d) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2158(d), and delegated in section 401 of this order (relating to establishment of advisory committees) shall be exercised only after consultation with, and in accordance with, guidelines and procedures established by the Administrator of General Services.
Sec. 403. Regulations. The Secretary of Homeland Security, after approval of the Attorney General, and after consultation by the Attorney General with the Chairman of the Federal Trade Commission, shall promulgate rules pursuant to section 708(e) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2158(e), incorporating standards and procedures by which voluntary agreements and plans of action may be developed and carried out. Such rules may be adopted by other agencies to fulfill the rulemaking requirement of section 708(e) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2158(e).
PART V – EMPLOYMENT OF PERSONNEL
Sec. 501. National Defense Executive Reserve. (a) In accordance with section 710(e) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2160(e), there is established in the executive branch a National Defense Executive Reserve (NDER) composed of persons of recognized expertise from various segments of the private sector and from Government (except full time Federal employees) for training for employment in executive positions in the Federal Government in the event of a national defense emergency.
(b) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall issue necessary guidance for the NDER program, including appropriate guidance for establishment, recruitment, training, monitoring, and activation of NDER units and shall be responsible for the overall coordination of the NDER program. The authority of the President under section 710(e) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2160(e), to determine periods of national defense emergency is delegated to the Secretary of Homeland Security.
(c) The head of any agency may implement section 501(a) of this order with respect to NDER operations in such agency.
(d) The head of each agency with an NDER unit may exercise the authority under section 703 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2153, to employ civilian personnel when activating all or a part of its NDER unit. The exercise of this authority shall be subject to the provisions of sections 501(e) and (f) of this order and shall not be redelegated.
(e) The head of an agency may activate an NDER unit, in whole or in part, upon the written determination of the Secretary of Homeland Security that an emergency affecting the national defense exists and that the activation of the unit is necessary to carry out the emergency program functions of the agency.
(f) Prior to activating the NDER unit, the head of the agency shall notify, in writing, the Assistant to the President for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism of the impending activation.
Sec. 502. Consultants. The head of each agency otherwise delegated functions under this order is delegated the authority of the President under sections 710(b) and (c) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2160(b), (c), to employ persons of outstanding experience and ability without compensation and to employ experts, consultants, or organizations. The authority delegated by this section may not be redelegated.
PART VI – LABOR REQUIREMENTS
Sec. 601. Secretary of Labor. (a) The Secretary of Labor, in coordination with the Secretary of Defense and the heads of other agencies, as deemed appropriate by the Secretary of Labor, shall:
(1) collect and maintain data necessary to make a continuing appraisal of the Nation’s workforce needs for purposes of national defense;
(2) upon request by the Director of Selective Service, and in coordination with the Secretary of Defense, assist the Director of Selective Service in development of policies regulating the induction and deferment of persons for duty in the armed services;
(3) upon request from the head of an agency with authority under this order, consult with that agency with respect to: (i) the effect of contemplated actions on labor demand and utilization; (ii) the relation of labor demand to materials and facilities requirements; and (iii) such other matters as will assist in making the exercise of priority and allocations functions consistent with effective utilization and distribution of labor;
(4) upon request from the head of an agency with authority under this order: (i) formulate plans, programs, and policies for meeting the labor requirements of actions to be taken for national defense purposes; and (ii) estimate training needs to help address national defense requirements and promote necessary and appropriate training programs; and
(5) develop and implement an effective labor management relations policy to support the activities and programs under this order, with the cooperation of other agencies as deemed appropriate by the Secretary of Labor, including the National Labor Relations Board, the Federal Labor Relations Authority, the National Mediation Board, and the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service.
(b) All agencies shall cooperate with the Secretary of Labor, upon request, for the purposes of this section, to the extent permitted by law.
PART VII – DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT COMMITTEE
Sec. 701. The Defense Production Act Committee. (a) The Defense Production Act Committee (Committee) shall be composed of the following members, in accordance with section 722(b) of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2171(b):
(1) The Secretary of State;
(2) The Secretary of the Treasury;
(3) The Secretary of Defense;
(4) The Attorney General;
(5) The Secretary of the Interior;
(6) The Secretary of Agriculture;
(7) The Secretary of Commerce;
(8) The Secretary of Labor;
(9) The Secretary of Health and Human Services;
(10) The Secretary of Transportation;
(11) The Secretary of Energy;
(12) The Secretary of Homeland Security;
(13) The Director of National Intelligence;
(14) The Director of the Central Intelligence Agency;
(15) The Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers;
(16) The Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration; and
(17) The Administrator of General Services.
(b) The Director of OMB and the Director of the Office of Science and Technology Policy shall be invited to participate in all Committee meetings and activities in an advisory role. The Chairperson, as designated by the President pursuant to section 722 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2171, may invite the heads of other agencies or offices to participate in Committee meetings and activities in an advisory role, as appropriate.
Sec. 702. Offsets. The Secretary of Commerce shall prepare and submit to the Congress the annual report required by section 723 of the Act, 50 U.S.C. App. 2172, in consultation with the Secretaries of State, the Treasury, Defense, and Labor, the United States Trade Representative, the Director of National Intelligence, and the heads of other agencies as appropriate. The heads of agencies shall provide the Secretary of Commerce with such information as may be necessary for the effective performance of this function.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)